Current:Home > MyPrince Harry Loses High Court Challenge Over Paying for His Own Security in the U.K. -TradeWise
Prince Harry Loses High Court Challenge Over Paying for His Own Security in the U.K.
View
Date:2025-04-28 04:19:30
Prince Harry is facing a royal setback in his quest for protection.
London's High Court has ruled against the Duke of Sussex on May 23 over his attempt to pay for his own security when he's in the U.K.
After he and wife Meghan Markle stepped back from their royal duties amid their move to America in 2020, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex lost access to police security that usually accompanies royal members. Now, according to Reuters, the High Court in London has ruled his lawyers could not move forward with a judicial review that would explore whether he could pay for the protective agents himself.
The decision to take away publicly-funded security was made by the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures, also known as RAVEC. And according to the BBC, Judge Martin Chamberlain said in his ruling said that RAVEC was not incorrect in their decision that allowing payment for protection would be against public interest.
E! News has reached out to Harry's reps for comment and have not heard back.
The ruling comes less than one week after Harry, Meghan and her mom Doria Ragland were involved in a "near catastrophic car chase" with "highly aggressive paparazzi," per the couple's rep, after attending a gala in NYC on May 16.
After the incident, authorities also addressed the situation, telling E! News in a statement, "There were numerous photographers that made their transport challenging. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex arrived at their destination and there were no reported collisions, summonses, injuries, or arrests in regard."
Get the latest tea from inside the palace walls. Sign up for Royal Recap!veryGood! (25)
Related
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- Jonah Hill's Ex Sarah Brady Accuses Actor of Emotional Abuse
- Birmingham honors the Black businessman who quietly backed the Civil Rights Movement
- This $41 Dress Is a Wardrobe Essential You Can Wear During Every Season of the Year
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- What we know about the 5 men who were aboard the wrecked Titan sub
- Biden kept Trump's tariffs on Chinese imports. This is who pays the price
- Biden is targeting the ‘junk fees’ you’re always paying. But it may not save you money.
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Oil Companies Are Eying Federal Climate Funds to Expand Hydrogen Production. Will Their Projects Cut Emissions?
Ranking
- Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
- Logan Paul and Nina Agdal Are Engaged: Inside Their Road to Romance
- Watch Carlee Russell press conference's: Police give update on missing Alabama woman
- What personal financial stress can do to the economy
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Inside Clean Energy: Some EVs Now Pay for Themselves in a Year
- Save 50% On This Calf and Foot Stretcher With 1,800+ 5-Star Amazon Reviews
- Taking a breather: Fed holds interest rates steady in patient battle against inflation
Recommendation
Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
Trisha Paytas Announces End of Podcast With Colleen Ballinger Amid Controversy
This $41 Dress Is a Wardrobe Essential You Can Wear During Every Season of the Year
Denver psychedelics conference attracts thousands
Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
With Fossil Fuel Companies Facing Pressure to Reduce Carbon Emissions, Private Equity Is Buying Up Their Aging Oil, Gas and Coal Assets
Mega Millions jackpot rises to $820 million, fifth-largest ever: What you need to know
FTC sues Amazon for 'tricking and trapping' people in Prime subscriptions