Current:Home > MarketsHow Biden's latest student loan forgiveness differs from debt relief blocked by Supreme Court -TradeWise
How Biden's latest student loan forgiveness differs from debt relief blocked by Supreme Court
View
Date:2025-04-12 04:18:51
Washington — The Biden administration announced Friday that it will wipe out $39 billion in student debt for more than 800,000 borrowers, relief that comes weeks after the Supreme Court invalidated a separate, broader effort by President Biden to address student loan debt.
Unlike the broad forgiveness Mr. Biden originally attempted to provide, the forthcoming debt discharges by the Department of Education are narrower, stemming from "fixes" announced by the administration in April 2022 to ensure borrowers enrolled in income-driven repayment plans have an accurate count of the number of monthly payments that go toward forgiveness.
The new student debt plan also relies on a different law than the one that was struck down by the Supreme Court. Under the 1965 Higher Education Act and federal regulations, a borrower is eligible for loan forgiveness after making 240 or 300 qualifying monthly payments — roughly 20 or 25 years of payments — on an income-driven repayment plan or standard repayment plan. The administration said "inaccurate payment counts" caused borrowers to lose "hard-earned progress" toward having their loans forgiven, which it has sought to remedy.
Loans covered include Direct Loans or Federal Family Education Loans held by the Department of Education, including Parent PLUS Loans.
The Supreme Court student loan decision
The latest announcement from the Department of Education is part of the Biden administration's efforts to provide relief to Americans with student loan debt, and is different from the program struck down by the Supreme Court late last month.
Under that plan, which the court's conservative majority said is unlawful, eligibility depended on income. Borrowers earning up to $125,000 annually could have up to $10,000 in student debt forgiven. Qualifying Pell Grant recipients, students with the greatest financial need, who met the income threshold could have had up to an additional $10,000 in relief.
That plan by the Biden administration was far more sweeping, with an estimated 40 million Americans eligible for relief, 20 million of whom would have had their loan balances erased.
The program also relied on a different law — the HEROES Act — than the loan discharges announced Friday. The HEROES Act authorizes the education secretary to "waive or modify" student financial assistance programs for borrowers "in connection" with a national emergency, such as the pandemic.
But the Supreme Court disagreed, finding the administration overstepped its authority with its plan to erase $430 billion in student debt.
The court also invoked the so-called "major questions" doctrine in part of its ruling, a legal theory that holds there must be clear congressional authorization for an executive branch agency to decide an issue of "vast economic or political significance."
The "economic and political significance" of the loan forgiveness plan, Roberts wrote, "is staggering by any measure." The court ruled that the education secretary could modify "existing statutory or regulatory provisions" under the Education Act, but "not to rewrite that statute from the ground up."
veryGood! (6143)
Related
- NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
- Inside Clean Energy: From Sweden, a Potential Breakthrough for Clean Steel
- Nintendo's Wii U and 3DS stores closing means game over for digital archives
- Thousands of Amazon Shoppers Say This 50% Off Folding Makeup Mirror Is a Must-Have
- What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
- The Best Neck Creams Under $26 to Combat Sagging Skin and Tech Neck
- Saving Starving Manatees Will Mean Saving This Crucial Lagoon Habitat
- Biden Promised to Stop Oil Drilling on Public Lands. Is His Failure to Do So a Betrayal or a Smart Political Move?
- Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
- Inside Clean Energy: What’s Cool, What We Suspect and What We Don’t Yet Know about Ford’s Electric F-150
Ranking
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- In Glasgow, COP26 Negotiators Do Little to Cut Emissions, but Allow Oil and Gas Executives to Rest Easy
- A Commonsense Proposal to Deal With Plastics Pollution: Stop Making So Much Plastic
- Warming Trends: How Urban Parks Make Every Day Feel Like Christmas, Plus Fire-Proof Ceramic Homes and a Thriller Set in Fracking Country
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Seeing pink: Brands hop on Barbie bandwagon amid movie buzz
- Sophia Culpo’s Ex Braxton Berrios Responds to Cheating Allegations
- Get a Tan in 1 Hour and Save 42% On St. Tropez Express Self-Tanning Mousse
Recommendation
'Kraven the Hunter' spoilers! Let's dig into that twisty ending, supervillain reveal
Biden Promised to Stop Oil Drilling on Public Lands. Is His Failure to Do So a Betrayal or a Smart Political Move?
After It Narrowed the EPA’s Authority, Talks of Expanding the Supreme Court Garner New Support
Get a Next-Level Clean and Save 58% On This Water Flosser With 4,200+ 5-Star Amazon Reviews
Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
Warming Trends: Banning a Racist Slur on Public Lands, and Calculating Climate’s Impact on Yellowstone, Birds and Banks
Honda recalls more than 330,000 vehicles due to a side-view mirror issue
Chemours’ Process for Curtailing Greenhouse Gas Emissions Could Produce Hazardous Air Pollutants in Louisville