Current:Home > NewsJury convicts former Kentucky officer of using excessive force on Breonna Taylor during deadly raid -TradeWise
Jury convicts former Kentucky officer of using excessive force on Breonna Taylor during deadly raid
View
Date:2025-04-18 12:18:56
LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) — A federal jury on Friday convicted a former Kentucky police detective of using excessive force on Breonna Taylor during a botched 2020 drug raid that left her dead.
The 12-member jury returned the late-night verdict after clearing Brett Hankison earlier in the evening on a charge that he used excessive force on Taylor’s neighbors.
It was the first conviction of a Louisville police officer who was involved in the deadly raid.
Some members of the jury were in tears as the verdict was read around 9:30 p.m. They had earlier indicated to the judge in two separate messages that they were deadlocked on the charge of using excessive force on Taylor, but chose to continue deliberating. The six-man, six-woman jury deliberated for more than 20 hours over three days.
Taylor’s mother, Tamika Palmer, celebrated the verdict with friends outside the federal courthouse, saying: “It took a lot of time. It took a lot of patience. It was hard. The jurors took their time to really understand that Breonna deserved justice.”
In a statement posted to social media Saturday, the Louisville Metro Police Department said that it respects the jury’s verdict and that since 2020, it has improved training, practices and policies and implemented reforms emphasizing “accountability and thorough investigations.”
“It is not lost on us that this event forever altered the fabric of our community, and we acknowledge the pain caused by the death of Breonna Taylor,” the department said. “Our officers are sworn to protect and serve the community, upholding the law with integrity and fairness. We condemn any behavior that runs afoul of the mission to help and protect our citizens.”
“Breonna Taylor’s life mattered,” said Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. “We hope the jury’s verdict recognizing this violation of Ms. Taylor’s civil and constitutional rights brings some small measure of comfort to her family and loved ones who have suffered so deeply from the tragic events of March 2020.”
Hankison fired 10 shots into Taylor’s glass door and windows during the raid, but didn’t hit anyone. Some shots flew into a next-door neighbor’s adjoining apartment.
The death of the 26-year-old Black woman, along with the May 2020 police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis sparked racial injustice protests nationwide.
Bernice King, the daughter of Martin Luther King Jr., called the verdict “a long-awaited moment of accountability.”
“While it cannot restore Breonna to her family, it represents a crucial step in the pursuit of justice and a reminder that no one should be above the law,” King said in a social media post Friday night.
A separate jury deadlocked on federal charges against Hankison last year, and he was acquitted on state charges of wanton endangerment in 2022.
The conviction against Hankison carries a maximum sentence of life in prison. He will be sentenced on March 12 by U.S. District Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings.
Hankison, 48, argued throughout the trial that he was acting to protect his fellow officers after Taylor’s boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, fired on them when they broke down Taylor’s door with a battering ram.
This jury sent a note on Thursday to the judge asking whether they needed to know if Taylor was alive as Hankison fired his shots.
That was a point of contention during closing arguments, when Hankison’s attorney Don Malarcik told the jury that prosecutors must “prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Ms. Taylor was alive” when Hankison fired.
After the jury sent the question, Jennings urged them to keep deliberating.
Walker shot and wounded one of the officers. Hankison testified that when Walker fired, he moved away, rounded the corner of the apartment unit and fired into Taylor’s glass door and a window.
Meanwhile, officers at the door returned Walker’s fire, hitting and killing Taylor, who was in a hallway.
Hankison’s lawyers argued during closing statements Wednesday that Hankison was acting properly “in a very tense, very chaotic environment” that lasted about 12 seconds. They emphasized that Hankison’s shots didn’t hit anyone.
Hankison was one of four officers charged by the U.S. Department of Justice in 2022 with violating Taylor’s civil rights. Hankison’s verdict is the second conviction from those cases. The first was a plea deal from a former officer who was not at the raid and became a cooperating witness in another case.
Malarcik, Hankison’s attorney, spoke at length during closing arguments about the role of Taylor’s boyfriend, who fired the shot that hit former Sgt. John Mattingly at the door. He said Walker never tried to come to the door or turn the lights on as police were knocking and instead armed himself and hid in the dark.
“Brett Hankison was 12 inches away from being shot by Kenneth Walker,” Malarcik said.
Prosecutors said Hankison acted recklessly, firing 10 shots into doors and a window where he couldn’t see a target.
They said in closing arguments that Hankison “violated one of the most fundamental rules of deadly force: If they cannot see the person they’re shooting at, they cannot pull the trigger.”
Neither of the officers who shot Taylor — Mattingly and former Detective Myles Cosgrove — were charged in Taylor’s death. Federal and state prosecutors have said those officers were justified in returning fire, since Taylor’s boyfriend shot at them first.
veryGood! (6)
Related
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- Report: Bills' Nyheim Hines out for season with knee injury suffered on jet ski
- Ex-NYPD sergeant convicted of acting as Chinese agent
- Underwater noises detected in area of search for sub that was heading to Titanic wreckage, Coast Guard says
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- What is the GOLO diet? Experts explain why its not for everyone.
- California Startup Turns Old Wind Turbines Into Gold
- Khloe Kardashian Shares Adorable Cousin Crew Photo With True, Dream, Chicago and Psalm
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Jonathan Majors' domestic violence trial scheduled for August in New York City
Ranking
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- Taylor Lautner Calls Out Hateful Comments Saying He Did Not Age Well
- Gene therapy for muscular dystrophy stirs hopes and controversy
- Blake Shelton Gets in One Last Dig at Adam Levine Before Exiting The Voice
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- Why Nick Jonas’ Performance With Kelsea Ballerini Caused Him to Go to Therapy
- 10-year-old boy uses musical gift to soothe homeless dogs at Texas shelter
- Cleveland Becomes Cleantech Leader But Ohio Backtracks on Renewable Energy
Recommendation
Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
Crushed by Covid-19, Airlines Lobby for a Break on Emissions Offsets
American Idol’s Just Sam Is Singing at Subway Stations Again 3 Years After Winning Show
What is the GOLO diet? Experts explain why its not for everyone.
FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
Do you freeze up in front of your doctor? Here's how to talk to your physician
Why Nick Jonas’ Performance With Kelsea Ballerini Caused Him to Go to Therapy
What could we do with a third thumb?