Current:Home > MyJustice Department reverses position, won't support shielding Trump in original E. Jean Carroll lawsuit -TradeWise
Justice Department reverses position, won't support shielding Trump in original E. Jean Carroll lawsuit
View
Date:2025-04-20 10:15:09
The Justice Department on Tuesday reversed its position that former President Donald Trump was shielded from a 2019 defamation lawsuit filed by the writer E. Jean Carroll.
The government had originally argued that Trump was protected from liability by the Westfall Act, because he was acting as a federal employee. Under the act, federal employees are entitled to absolute immunity from personal lawsuits for conduct occurring within the scope of their employment.
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian Boynton wrote in a letter Tuesday to attorneys for Trump and Carroll that a jury's determination in a separate civil lawsuit that Trump was liable for sexual abuse and defamation of Carroll factored into the decision. That lawsuit was filed in November 2022 and involved statements Trump made after his presidency.
"The allegations that prompted the statements related to a purely personal incident: an alleged sexual assault that occurred decades prior to Mr. Trump's Presidency," Boynton wrote. "That sexual assault was obviously not job-related."
Carroll filed her first lawsuit in 2019, while Trump was still president — and after he accused her of "totally lying" when she said he sexually assaulted her in a high-end New York City department store in the 1990s. In October 2021, a federal judge in New York ruled that Trump was not shielded from Carroll's suit. In 2022, the 2nd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals reversed the lower court's decision and suggested the Westfall Act could protect Trump from liability in the case.
The lawsuit has remained active and has yet to go to trial. After the jury found Trump liable in April, Carroll amended the suit, adding new defamation claims related to more recent statements made by Trump, and he filed a countersuit.
The Justice Department had initially argued that even though "the former president made crude and offensive comments in response to the very serious accusations of sexual assault" the law protecting employees like the president from such a lawsuit should be upheld.
But the Justice Department reviewed that decision after the jury in Carroll's second lawsuit in New York found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, Boynton wrote. It concluded that Trump had not acted "out of a desire to serve the government" when he denied her claims.
Boynton also cited statements Trump has made about Carroll in the years since his presidency ended.
"These post-Presidency statements, which were not before the Department during the original scope certification in this case, tend to undermine the claim that the former President made very similar statements at issue in Carroll out of a desire to serve the government," Boynton wrote.
Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan expressed gratitude for the department's reversal and said in a statement, "We have always believed that Donald Trump made his defamatory statements about our client in June 2019 out of personal animus, ill will, and spite, and not as President of the United States."
She added that "we look forward to trial in E Jean Carroll's original case in January 2024."
An attorney for Trump did not immediately return a request for comment.
- In:
- E. Jean Carroll
- Lawsuit
- Donald Trump
- New York
Graham Kates is an investigative reporter covering criminal justice, privacy issues and information security for CBS News Digital. Contact Graham at KatesG@cbsnews.com or grahamkates@protonmail.com
veryGood! (753)
Related
- Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
- Churchill Downs to improve track maintenance, veterinary resources for fall meet after horse deaths
- Extreme Rain From Atmospheric Rivers and Ice-Heating Micro-Cracks Are Ominous New Threats to the Greenland Ice Sheet
- Pressure? Megan Rapinoe, USWNT embrace it: 'Hell yeah. This is exactly where we want to be.'
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Inmate sues one of the nation’s largest private prison operators over his 2021 stabbing
- 10 people died at the Astroworld music festival two years ago. What happens now?
- Erykah Badu flirts with crush John Boyega onstage during surprise meeting: Watch
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- What are the healthiest beans? Check out these nutrient-dense options to boost your diet.
Ranking
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- Cycling Star Magnus White Dead at 17 After Being Struck By Car During Bike Ride
- Turn Your Favorite Pet Photos Into a Pawfect Portrait for Just $20
- Nicki Minaj is coming to Call of Duty as first female Operator
- 'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
- Leanne Morgan, the 'Mrs. Maisel of Appalachia,' jokes about motherhood and menopause
- Girl, 6, is latest child to die or be injured from boating accidents this summer across US
- Mar-a-Lago property manager to be arraigned in classified documents probe
Recommendation
Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
S.C. nurse who fatally poisoned husband with eye drops: I just wanted him to suffer
Musk threatens to sue researchers who documented the rise in hateful tweets
Wisconsin judge dismisses lawsuit over military voting lists
House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
Appellate court rules that Missouri man with schizophrenia can be executed after all
Wicked weather slams millions in US as storms snap heat wave on East Coast
New film honors angel who saved over 200 lives during Russian occupation of Bucha