Current:Home > reviewsFundraising off to slow start in fight over Missouri abortion amendment -TradeWise
Fundraising off to slow start in fight over Missouri abortion amendment
View
Date:2025-04-11 13:23:34
COLUMBIA, Mo. (AP) — What’s expected to be an expensive and bitter fight over multiple Missouri abortion-rights ballot measures so far has not attracted much money.
An abortion-rights campaign called Missourians for Constitutional Freedom had no money on hand as of Dec. 31, according to campaign finance reports filed Tuesday. The group received $25,000 in nonmonetary aid from the American Civil Liberties Union last year.
The campaign has not yet announced which of 11 versions of its proposal it intends to push forward. Some versions would allow the Republican-led Legislature to regulate abortion after fetal viability, a divisive issue among abortion-rights activists.
A competing Republican-backed campaign raised roughly $61,000, most of which came from a $50,000 donation from Director Jamie Corley. Her proposal would allow abortions up to 12 weeks into pregnancy, and in cases of rape, incest or to protect the life of the mother, until fetal viability.
It typically costs millions of dollars just to pay workers to collect enough voter signatures to get a constitutional amendment on the Missouri ballot. Campaigns have until May to collect more than 170,000 signatures to get on the November ballot.
In Ohio, a successful 2023 initiative guaranteeing abortion rights cost a combined $70 million. Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights, the campaign in favor of the initiative, raised and spent more than $39.5 million to pass the constitutional amendment. Protect Women Ohio, the campaign against it, raised and spent about $30.4 million.
Meanwhile, an anti-abortion group called Missouri Stands with Women launched its own campaign Tuesday to block any abortion-rights measure from passing. Because the campaign was formed Tuesday, no fundraising has been reported yet.
veryGood! (4)
Related
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- DOE Explores a New Frontier In Quest for Cheaper Solar Panels
- Biden set his 'moonshot' on cancer. Meet the doctor trying to get us there
- 2017: Pipeline Resistance Gathers Steam From Dakota Access, Keystone Success
- Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
- Global Warming Is Hitting Ocean Species Hardest, Including Fish Relied on for Food
- Amid Boom, U.S. Solar Industry Fears End of Government Incentives
- Shoppers Can’t Get Enough of This Sol de Janeiro Body Cream and Fragrance With 16,800+ 5-Star Reviews
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- Long Phased-Out Refrigeration and Insulation Chemicals Still Widely in Use and Warming the Climate
Ranking
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- The Truth Behind Paige DeSorbo and Craig Conover's Confusing AF Fight on Summer House
- Coronavirus ‘Really Not the Way You Want To Decrease Emissions’
- Kate Spade 24-Hour Flash Deal: Get This $380 Backpack for Just $99
- Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
- Rob Kardashian Makes Rare Comment About Daughter Dream Kardashian
- 'The Last Of Us' made us wonder: Could a deadly fungus really cause a pandemic?
- How financial counseling at the pediatrician's office can help families thrive
Recommendation
Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
What does the science say about the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic?
Why Lizzo Says She's Not Trying to Escape Fatness in Body Positivity Message
Does drinking alcohol affect your dementia risk? We asked a researcher for insights
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
Keystone XL, Dakota Pipelines Will Draw Mass Resistance, Native Groups Promise
2018’s Hemispheric Heat Wave Wasn’t Possible Without Climate Change, Scientists Say
DOJ report finds Minneapolis police use dangerous excessive force and discriminatory conduct